24 Mar 2021 (Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ (President of Chamber E Regan, President of Court, acting as Judge of Fifth Chamber K Lenaerts, Judges M Ilešič, C Lycourgos, I Jarukaitis, Advocate General A Rantos)
CONFLICT OF LAWS — Jurisdiction under European Union Regulation — Orders with respect to children — Child resident in member state wrongfully removed to or retained in third state and acquiring habitual residence there — Proceedings in relation to parental responsibility brought in member state — Whether member state having jurisdiction — Whether Regulation applying to conflict of jurisdiction between member state and third state — Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, art 10
(Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ
EU Enactments
Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (Council), art 10
Cases considered in: SS v MCP (Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ
SS v MCP Applied
Cases cited in: SS v MCP (Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ
Acacia Srl v Pneusgarda Srl (Joined Cases C-397/16 and C-435/16); EU:C:2017:992; [2018] Bus LR 927; [2018] WLR(D) 9, ECJ
CV v DU (Case C-85/18PPU) EU:C:2018:220; [2018] IL Pr 21, ECJ
Criminal proceedings against ZW (Case C-454/19); EU:C:2020:947, ECJ
FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság (Joined Cases C-924/19 PPU and C-925/19 PPU); EU:C:2020:367, ECJ
In re H (Children) [2014] EWCA Civ 1101; [2015] 1 WLR 863; [2015] 1 FLR 1132; [2014] WLR (D) 343, CA
Jobcenter Krefeld - Widerspruchsstelle v JD (Case C-181/19); EU:C:2020:794, ECJ
Kainz v Pantherwerke AG (Case C-45/13); EU:C:2014:7; [2015] QB 34; [2014] 3 WLR 1292; [2014] 1 All ER (Comm) 433; [2014] CN 15, ECJ
L v M (R intervening) (Case C-656/13); EU:C:2014:2364; [2015] Fam 173; [2015] 2 WLR 801; [2015] All ER (EC) 188; [2015] 2 FLR 169; [2014] WLR (D) 480, ECJ
Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG (Case C-170/12); EU:C:2013:635; [2013] Bus LR 1313; [2013] WLR (D) 367, ECJ
Povse v Alpago (Case C-211/10PPU); (Case C-211/10 PPU); EU:C:2010:400; [2011] Fam 199; [2011] 3 WLR 164; [2010] 2 FLR 1343, ECJ
Purrucker v Vallés Pérez (No 2) (Case C-296/10); EU:C:2010:665; [2011] Fam 312; [2011] 3 WLR 1040; [2012] 1 FLR 925, ECJ
Rinau v Rinau (Case C-195/08 PPU); EU:C:2008:406; [2009] Fam 51; [2009] 2 WLR 972; [2008] All ER (EC) 1145; [2008] 2 FLR 1495, ECJ
Rudigier (Public procurement - Public passenger transport services by rail and by road - Award of public service contracts - Judgment) (Case C-518/17); EU:C:2018:757, ECJ
SF v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst (Case C-631/17); EU:C:2019:381; [2019] PTSR 1771; [2019] WLR(D) 266, ECJ
Schrems v Facebook Ireland Ltd (Case C-498/16); EU:C:2017:863; EU:C:2018:37; [2018] 1 WLR 4343; [2018] WLR (D) 47, ECJ
Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH (Case C-836/18); EU:C:2020:119; [2020] 4 WLR 59; [2020] WLR(D) 119, ECJ
UD v XB (Case C-393/18PPU); (Case C-393/18 PPU); EU:C:2018:835; [2019] 1 WLR 3083; [2019] 1 FLR 289; [2018] WLR (D) 634, ECJ
W v X (Case C-499/15); EU:C:2017:118; [2017] Fam 305; [2017] 2 WLR 1369; [2017] 2 FLR 828; [2017] WLR (D) 113, ECJ
Cases subsequently considering: SS v MCP (Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ
Applied in CC v VO (Case C-572/21); EU:C:2022:562; [2022] 1 WLR 4183; [2022] 2 FLR 1175; [2022] WLR(D) 317, ECJ
Applied in SS v MCP (No 2) [2021] EWHC 2898 (Fam); [2021] 4 WLR 140; [2022] 2 FLR 105; [2021] WLR(D) 558, Fam D
Cases citing: SS v MCP (Case C-603/20PPU); (Case C-603/20 PPU); EU:C:2021:231; EU:C:2021:126; [2022] 1 WLR 1923; [2021] 2 FLR 927; [2021] WLR(D) 181; The Times, 19 April 2021, ECJ
AC v NC [2021] EWHC 946 (Fam), Fam D
BT v Seguros Catalana Occidente (Case C-708/20); EU:C:2021:986; [2022] 1 WLR 1887; [2021] WLR(D) 620, ECJ
CC v VO (Case C-572/21); EU:C:2022:562; [2022] 1 WLR 4183; [2022] 2 FLR 1175; [2022] WLR(D) 317, ECJ
DM and LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) - Alpes-Provence (Case C-337/20); EU:C:2021:564; EU:C:2021:671, ECJ
Greislzel (Case C-35/23); EU:C:2024:532, ECJ
M v F [2021] EWHC 585 (Fam), Fam D
SA v AA [2023] EWHC 2016 (Fam), Fam D
Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB (Case C-646/20); EU:C:2022:879; EU:C:2022:357; [2023] 1 WLR 3263; [2023] 1 FLR 1188; [2022] WLR(D) 452, ECJ (GC)
TT v AK (Case C-87/22); EU:C:2023:571; [2023] 1 WLR 4028; [2023] WLR(D) 334, ECJ
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies