Hearings
02 Aug 2019 [2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
13 Oct 2021 [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc) (Lord Hodge DPSC, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows JJSC)
02 Aug 2019 [2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
13 Oct 2021 [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc) (Lord Hodge DPSC, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows JJSC)
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Employment tribunals — Interim relief — Claimant granted award by Scottish employment tribunal in proceedings against former employer — Claimant seeking interim relief after failure to pay award — Scottish law requiring separate court action to be raised to obtain interim remedy of warrant to arrest employer’s bank accounts on dependence of claim — Whether Scottish courts having jurisdiction to grant warrant for arrestment on dependence of tribunal application — Whether requirement for separate court proceedings breaching EU law principles of effectiveness, effective remedy and equivalence — Whether UK failing to properly implement EU Directives — Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 (c 18), Pt 1A
[2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc)
JUDICIAL REVIEW — European Union law — Whether implementation of directives on discrimination in employment contrary to European Union law
[2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
EMPLOYMENT — Discrimination — Whether competent to raise ancillary proceedings in an ordinary court for diligence on the dependence in respect of an employment tribunal claim
[2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
EUROPEAN LAW — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of equivalence — Whether failure to provide for interim diligence in respect of discrimination claims a contravention of principles of effectiveness and equivalence
[2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
PRACTICE — Anonymity — Circumstances in which an anonymity order should be made
[2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
Anwar v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] CSIH 43; 2020 SC 95, Ct of Sess
Decision of the First Division of the Inner House of the Court of Session affirmed
Anwar v Advocate General for Scotland [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc)
Statutes
Cases considered in: Anwar v Advocate General for Scotland [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc)
Fordyce v Bridges (1842) 4 D 1334, Ct of Sess Applied
Hawkins v Wedderburn (1842) 4 D 924, Ct of Sess Applied
Cases cited in: Anwar v Advocate General for Scotland [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc)
Amicus v Dynamex Friction Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 381; [2009] ICR 511, CA
Atkinson & Wood v Mackintosh (1905) 7 F 598; 12 SLT 856, Ct of Sess
Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers [1891] AC 107, HL
Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-48/93); (Joined cases C-46/93 and C-48/93); EU:C:1996:79; [1996] QB 404; [1996] 2 WLR 506; [1996] All ER (EC) 301; [1996] ECR I-1029, ECJ
Brown v Hamilton District Council [1982] UKHL 13; 1983 SC (HL) 1; (1983) 133 NLJ 63; 1983 SLT 397, HL(Sc)
Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (Case C-392/96); EU:C:1999:431; [2000] QB 636; [2000] 2 WLR 958, ECJ
Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Case C-144/99) EU:C:2001:257; [2001] ECR I-3541, ECJ
ENEFI Energiahatékonysági Nyrt v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP) (Case C-212/15) EU:C:2016:841; [2017] IL Pr 10, ECJ
Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] UKSC 34; [2017] 1 WLR 1373; [2017] PTSR 539; [2017] 4 All ER 1; [2017] WLR (D) 272; Case details, SC(E)
European Commission v United Kingdom (supported by the Kingdom of Denmark intervening) (Case C-530/11); EU:C:2013:554; EU:C:2014:67; [2014] QB 988; [2014] 3 WLR 853; [2014] WLR (D) 69, ECJ
Fordyce v Bridges (1842) 4 D 1334, Ct of Sess
Francovich v Italian Republic (Joined cases C-6/90 and C-9/90); EU:C:1991:428; [1995] ICR 722; [1991] ECR I-5357; [1992] IRLR 84; The Times, 20 November 1991, ECJ
Hamlyn & Co v Talisker Distillery [1894] AC 202, HL
Hawkins v Wedderburn (1842) 4 D 924, Ct of Sess
Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food (Case C-268/06); EU:C:2008:223; [2009] All ER (EC) 306, ECJ
Karl Construction Ltd v Palisade Properties plc 2002 SC 270; 2002 SLT 312, Ct of Sess
Križan v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia (Case C-416/10) EU:C:2013:8; [2013] Env LR 28, ECJ (GC)
ML v Aktiva Finants OÜ (Case C-433/18) EU:C:2019:1074; [2020] IL Pr 9, ECJ
MT Group v Howden Group plc 1993 SLT 345, Ct of Sess
MacDonald v MacDonald (1829) 7 Shaw 765, Ct of Sess
Mendok BV v Cumberland Maritime Corpn 1989 SLT 192, Ct of Sess
Minister for Justice and Equality v Workplace Relations Commission (Case C-378/17) EU:C:2018:979; [2019] 2 CMLR 13, ECJ (GC)
Motordrift A/S v Trachem Co Ltd 1982 SLT 127, Ct of Sess
Phonographic Performance Ltd v Department of Trade and Industry [2004] EWHC 1795 (Ch); [2004] 1 WLR 2893; [2005] 1 All ER 369, Ch D
Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Case C-73/16); EU:C:2017:725; [2017] 4 WLR 209; [2018] 1 CMLR 44; [2017] WLR(D) 624, ECJ
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54; [2011] 2 AC 15; [2011] 2 WLR 1; [2011] PTSR 185; [2011] 1 All ER 729; [2010] WLR (D) 322; Case details, SC(E)
R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192; [2005] 1 WLR 2600; [2005] 4 All ER 1, CA
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (Nos 1 and 2) [2017] UKSC 51; [2020] AC 869; [2017] 3 WLR 409; [2017] ICR 1037; [2017] 4 All ER 903; [2017] WLR (D) 552; Case details, SC(E)
R v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex p Factortame Ltd (No 2) (Case C-213/89); EU:C:1990:257; EU:C:1990:257; [1991] 1 AC 603; [1990] 3 WLR 818; [1991] 1 All ER 70; [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 351; The Times, 20 June 1990, ECJ
Rippin Group Ltd v ITP Interpipe SA 1995 SLT 831, Ct of Sess
Robert Taylor & Partners (Edinburgh) Ltd v William Gerard Ltd 1996 SLT (Sh Ct) 105
SL v Vueling Airlines SA (Case C-86/19); EU:C:2020:538; EU:C:2020:195; [2021] 1 WLR 2479; [2020] WLR(D) 425, ECJ
Sanderson & Son v Armour & Co Ltd 1922 SC (HL) 117, HL(Sc)
Svenska Petroleum AB v HOR Ltd 1986 SLT 513, Ct of Sess
ToTel Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2018] UKSC 44; [2018] UKSC 44; [2018] 1 WLR 4053; [2018] 4 All ER 949; [2018] STC 1642; [2018] WLR (D) 531; Case details, SC(E)
Unibet (London) Ltd v Justitiekanslern (Case C-432/05); EU:C:2007:163; [2008] All ER (EC) 453; [2007] ECR I-2271, ECJ
Cases citing: Anwar v Advocate General for Scotland [2021] UKSC 44; [2022] ICR 146; [2021] WLR(D) 536, SC(Sc)
Ali & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (EU Law equivalence) [2022] UKUT 278 (IAC), UT (IAC)
UK Supreme Court Blog
New Judgment: Anwar v The Advocate General for Scotland (representing the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) (Scotland) [2021] UKSC 44
Case comment
Case Comment: Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy) [2021] UKSC 44 Case comment
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies