Mengesteab v Federal Republic of Germany

Hearings

26 Jul 2017 (Case C-670/16); EU:C:2017:587; [2018] 1 WLR 865; [2017] WLR (D) 580, ECJ (President K Lenaerts, Vice-President A Tizzano, Presidents of Chambers R Silva de Lapuerta, M Ilešič, L Bay Larsen, Judges E Levits, J-C Bonichot, A Arabadjiev, C Toader, M Safjan, CG Fernlund, C Vajda, S Rodin, F Biltgen, K Jürimäe, Advocate General E Sharpston)

Additional names

Tsegezab Mengesteab v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Subject Matter

EUROPEAN UNION — Immigration — Asylum — Immigration authority in first member state receiving main information contained in applicant’s certificate of registration as asylum seeker — Fingerprint database search revealing applicant’s fingerprints previously taken in second member state — First member state requesting second member state to take charge of applicant after expiry of time limit — Applicant bringing action challenging decision to transfer him — Whether applicant able to rely on expiry of time limit — Whether receipt of information from fingerprint database permitting time limit to be exceeded — Whether application for international protection deemed to have been lodged if only main information contained in written document reaching immigration authority — Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, arts 20(2), 21(1), 27(1)

(Case C-670/16); EU:C:2017:587; [2018] 1 WLR 865; [2017] WLR (D) 580, ECJ

Legislation Considered

EU Enactments

Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Parliament and Council), arts 20(2), 21(1), 27(1)

Cases Cited

Cases cited in: Mengesteab v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-670/16); EU:C:2017:587; [2018] 1 WLR 865; [2017] WLR (D) 580, ECJ

Abdullahi v Bundesasylamt (Case C-394/12); EU:C:2013:813; [2014] 1 WLR 1895; [2013] WLR (D) 481, ECJ

Brahim Samba Diouf v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration. (Case C-69/10); EU:C:2011:524, ECJ

C. K. and Others v Republika Slovenija (Case C-578/16 PPU); EU:C:2017:127, ECJ

European Commission v Kadi (Joined Cases C-584/10P, C-593/10P and C-595/10P); [2014] 1 CMLR 24, ECJ

European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Case C-355/10) EU:C:2012:516; [2013] 1 CMLR 1, ECJ

Ghezelbash v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Case C-63/15); EU:C:2016:409; [2016] 1 WLR 3969; [2016] WLR (D) 301, ECJ

Jyske Finans A/S v Skatteministeriet (Case C-280/04) EU:C:2005:753; [2005] ECR I-10683, ECJ

Kadi v Council of the European Union (Joined Cases C-402/05P and C-415/05P); (Joined cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P); EU:C:2008:461; [2009] AC 1225; [2009] 3 WLR 872; [2010] All ER (EC) 1105; [2008] ECR I-6351, ECJ

Karim v Migrationsverket (Case C-155/15); EU:C:2016:410; [2017] 1 CMLR 7, ECJ

M v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland (Case C-277/11); EU:C:2012:744; [2013] 1 WLR 1259; [2012] WLR (D) 359, ECJ

N v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (Case C-604/12); EU:C:2013:714; EU:C:2014:302; [2014] 1 WLR 3371; [2014] WLR (D) 190, ECJ

Proceedings brought by Jafari (Case C-646/16); EU:C:2017:586; [2018] 1 WLR 773; [2017] WLR (D) 524, ECJ

R (MA (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AIRE Centre intervening) (Case C-648/11); EU:C:2013:367; [2013] 1 WLR 2961; [2013] WLR (D) 217, ECJ

R (NS (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd intervening) (Joined cases C-411/10 and C-493/10); EU:C:2011:865; [2013] QB 102; [2012] 3 WLR 1374; [2012] All ER (EC) 1011; [2012] 2 CMLR 9; [2011] WLR (D) 388, ECJ

S v Republic of Slovenia (Case C-490/16); EU:C:2017:585; [2018] 1 WLR 852; [2017] WLR (D) 526, ECJ

Cases citing

Cases citing: Mengesteab v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-670/16); EU:C:2017:587; [2018] 1 WLR 865; [2017] WLR (D) 580, ECJ

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Suspension administrative de la décision de transfert) (Case C-245/21); EU:C:2022:709, ECJ

Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Hasan (Case C-360/16); EU:C:2018:35; [2018] Imm AR 823, ECJ

Child and Family Agency v M [2018] EWHC 1581 (Fam); [2019] Fam 199; [2019] 2 WLR 871; [2019] 1 FLR 441; [2018] WLR (D) 635, Fam D

Fathi v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite (Case C-56/17); EU:C:2018:803; EU:C:2018:621; [2019] 1 WLR 4877; [2019] WLR(D) 152, ECJ

Hassan v Préfet du Pas-de-Calais (Case C-647/16); EU:C:2018:368; [2018] 1 WLR 4711; [2018] WLR(D) 322, ECJ

I GmbH v Finanzamt H (Case C-228/20); EU:C:2022:275, ECJ

Jawo v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-163/17); EU:C:2019:218; EU:C:2018:613; [2019] 1 WLR 3925; [2019] WLR(D) 161, ECJ

MS (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKUT 9 (IAC), UT

Minister for Justice (Clause discrétionnaire – Recours) (Case C-359/22); EU:C:2024:334, ECJ

Minister for Justice and Equality v JR (Case C-488/19); EU:C:2021:206; EU:C:2020:738; [2022] 1 WLR 1453; [2021] WLR(D) 166, ECJ

Ministero dell’Interno (Brochure commune – Refoulement indirect) (Case C-228/21); EU:C:2023:934, ECJ

R (BAA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKUT 227 (IAC), UT (IAC)

R (BJ & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKUT 66 (IAC), UT (IAC)

R (FB (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1338; [2022] QB 185; [2021] 2 WLR 839; [2021] 3 All ER 424; [2020] WLR(D) 580; The Times, 25 November 2020, CA

R (Hemmati) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2122; [2019] QB 708; [2019] 2 WLR 814; [2018] WLR (D) 632, CA

R (MH (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Practice Note) [2022] EWCA Civ 1296; [2023] 1 WLR 482, CA

R (MS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 1340, CA

R (Safe Passage International) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1821 (Admin); [2022] 1 WLR 165; [2021] WLR(D) 372, DC

RSM (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 18; [2018] 1 WLR 5489; [2018] WLR (D) 23, CA

Shiri v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Case C-201/16); EU:C:2017:805; [2018] 1 WLR 3384; [2017] WLR(D) 704, ECJ

Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Délai de transfert – Pluralité de demandes) (Case C-323/21); EU:C:2023:4; (Pluralité de demandes)), ECJ

Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Refus de prise en charge d’un mineur égyptien non accompagné) (Case C-19/21); EU:C:2022:605, ECJ

Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie v H (Joined Cases C-582/17 and C-583/17); EU:C:2019:280; EU:C:2018:975; [2019] 1 WLR 4993; [2019] WLR(D) 194, ECJ

X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Joined Cases C-47/17 and C-48/17); EU:C:2018:900; EU:C:2018:212; [2019] 1 WLR 4924; [2018] WLR(D) 700, ECJ

X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Case C-213/17); EU:C:2018:434; EU:C:2018:538; [2019] 1 WLR 279; [2018] WLR(D) 427, ECJ

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies