House of Lords
Regina
v
Webber
[2004] UKHL 1
2003 Dec 10, 11;
2004 Jan 22
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
CrimeEvidenceInterviewDefendant's failure to mention fact subsequently relied on in defenceSuggestion put to prosecution witness on behalf of defendant not accepted by witnessAdoption of evidence of co-defendantWhether “fact relied on in his defence” Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (c 33), s. 34(1)(a)
This content is available only to subscribers. If you have a subscription to this content, please log in.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies