Court of Appeal
Regina (Fulford Parish Council) v City of York Council
[2019] EWCA Civ 1359

Lewison, Floyd, Peter Jackson LJJ
2019 July 16; 30

PlanningDevelopment Planning permissionNon-material changes to planning permissionStatutory power to make non-material changes to planning permissionWhether including power to make non-material changes to conditional approvals of reserved matters Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (c 8), s 96A (as inserted by Planning Act 2008 (c 29), s 190(2))

The statutory power conferred by section 96A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to make non-material changes to a planning permission includes the power to make non-material changes to conditional approvals of reserved matters. The planning permission referred to in section 96A is the package consisting of the grant of planning permission itself, together with any conditions to which the grant is subjected, whether the conditions are imposed at the time of or subsequent to the grant of permission. An application for an amendment to an approval (or conditional approval) of reserved matters is an application for the alteration of an existing condition, which is expressly permitted by section 96A(3)(b). Since the power under section 96A is restricted to non-material changes, a change in approved reserved matters can have no material impact (para 35).

Where, therefore, the claimant’s application for permission to proceed with a a claim for judicial review of the decision of the local planning authority to approve a non-material amendment to a conditional approval of reserved matters on the ground that there had been no power to do so under section 96A of the 1990 Act had been refused, and where the claimant appealed against that refusal—

Held, appeal dismissed. Section 96A of the 1990 Act had empowered the local planning authority to approve the non-material amendments to the conditional approval of reserved matters (para 24, 34, 46, 47, 48).

R (Pressland) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 1763 (Admin) considered.

Decision of Andrews J affirmed.

Killian Garvey (instructed by Shoosmiths llp) for the claimant.

Jonathan Easton (instructed by Head of Civic Legal and Democratic Services, York City Council, York) for the local planning authority.

Giles Cannock QC (instructed by Walker Morris llp, Leeds) for the interested party.

Fraser Peh, Barrister

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies