The Weekly Law Reports
[2018] 3 WLR 556
Supreme Court
Regina
v
Mackinlay and others (Electoral Commission intervening)
[2018] UKSC 42
2018 May 23;
July 25
July 25
Baroness Hale of Richmond PSC, Lord Hughes, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones JJSC, Lord Mance
Election— Election expenses— Duty to declare— Defendants charged with knowingly making false declarations in relation to election expenses, or aiding and abetting or encouraging or assisting same— Expenditure incurred by national party for use or benefit of candidate without charge or at discount— Statutory provision requiring candidate to declare commercial value of same as if own election expenditure— Whether declaration requirement only if incurring of notional expenditure “authorised” by candidate or election agent or person authorised by them—
Representation of the People Act 1983 (c 2) (as amended by Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c 41), s 134(1) and Electoral Administration Act 2006 (c 22), ss 27(2), 74(1), Sch 1, para 117), ss 90ZA(4), 90C
This content is available only to subscribers. If you have a subscription to this content, please log in.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.