BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Subject Matter

DATA PROTECTION — Enforcement — Complaint — Supervisory authority rejecting data subject’s complaint of infringement by data controller — Data subject bringing parallel actions before two Hungarian courts in respect of supervisory authority’s decision and data controller’s infringement — Whether different remedies capable of being exercised concurrently with and independently of each other — Whether one remedy having priority over other — Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/679, arts 77(1), 78(1), 79(1) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, art 47

(Case C-132/21); EU:C:2023:2; EU:C:2022:661; [2023] 1 WLR 1887; [2023] WLR(D) 14, ECJ

Legislation Considered

EU Enactments

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, art 47

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (Parliament and Council), arts 77(1), 78(1), 79(1)

Cases Cited

Cases cited in: BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Case C-132/21); EU:C:2023:2; EU:C:2022:661; [2023] 1 WLR 1887; [2023] WLR(D) 14, ECJ

B v Latvijas Republikas Saeima (Case C-439/19); EU:C:2021:504; [2022] 1 CMLR 9, ECJ (GC)

EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH (Joined Cases C-274/21 and C-275/21); EU:C:2022:565, ECJ

Facebook Ireland Ltd v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Case C-645/19); EU:C:2021:483; EU:C:2021:5; [2021] 1 WLR 5161; [2021] WLR(D) 346, ECJ

LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Österreichische Gesundheitskasse (Case C-219/20); EU:C:2022:89, ECJ

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd (formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd) v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV (Case C-319/20); EU:C:2022:322; [2022] 4 WLR 69; [2022] WLR(D) 195, ECJ

Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Case C-73/16); EU:C:2017:725; [2017] 4 WLR 209; [2018] 1 CMLR 44; [2017] WLR(D) 624, ECJ

SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca (Case C-582/20); EU:C:2022:114, ECJ

Skeyes v Ryanair DAC (formerly Ryanair Ltd) (Case C-353/20); EU:C:2022:423, ECJ

Vodafone Kabel Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (Case C-484/20); EU:C:2021:975, ECJ

Cases citing

Cases citing: BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Case C-132/21); EU:C:2023:2; EU:C:2022:661; [2023] 1 WLR 1887; [2023] WLR(D) 14, ECJ

Beobank (Case C-351/21); EU:C:2023:215, ECJ

Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Boîte électronique judiciaire) (Case C-60/22); EU:C:2023:373, ECJ

Ferrovienord (Case C-363/21); EU:C:2023:563, ECJ

Másdi (Case C-169/23); EU:C:2024:988, ECJ

Odbor azylové a migrační politiky MV (Champ d’application de la directive retour) (Case C-257/22); EU:C:2023:852, ECJ

R (Delo) v Information Comr [2023] EWCA Civ 1141; [2024] 1 WLR 263; [2024] 3 All ER 663; [2023] WLR(D) 407, CA

SCHUFA Holding (Libération de reliquat de dette) (Case C-26/22); EU:C:2023:958, ECJ

VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (Case C-340/21); EU:C:2023:986; EU:C:2023:353; [2024] 1 WLR 2559; [2024] WLR(D) 17, ECJ

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies