Privy Council
Brown
v
Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline) and another
2000 Nov 6, 7, 8, 9;
Dec 5
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Clyde and the Rt Hon Ian Kirkwood
DevolutionScotland“Devolution issue”Human rightsRight to fair trialPrivilege against self-incriminationPolice suspecting defendant of having driven with excess alcoholDefendant required to identify driver of carWhether use of answer at trial incompatible with defendant's right not to incriminate herselfWhether acts of prosecutor capable of giving rise to “devolution issue” Road Traffic Act 1988 (c 52), s. 172(2) Scotland Act 1998 (c 46), s. 57(2), Sch. 6, para 1(d)
This content is available only to subscribers. If you have a subscription to this content, please log in.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies