The Law Reports (Appeal Cases)
[1985] AC 661
[HOUSE OF LORDS]
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL APPELLANTS AND GREAT PORTLAND ESTATES PLC. RESPONDENTS
1984 July 16,
17;
Oct. 31
Oct. 31
Lord Fraser of Tullybelton, Lord Wilberforce Lord Scarman, Lord Roskill and Lord Bridge of Harwich
Town Planning
— Development
— Local authority's development plan
— Protection of specific industrial activities
— Office development subject to non-statutory guidelines
— Whether interests of individual occupiers irrelevant to formulation of industrial policy
— Whether reliance on non-statutory guidelines invalid
— Inspector's recommendation following public inquiry rejected
— Whether duty to give reasons
—
Town and Country Planning Act 1971 (c. 78), Sch. 4, para. 11[1] (as substituted by Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act 1972 (c. 42), s. 4(1), Sch. 1)
This content is available only to subscribers. If you have a subscription to this content, please log in.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.