Family Division
In re KBH and others (Forced Marriage Protection Order: Non-resident British Citizen)
[2018] EWHC 2611 (Fam)
2018 Sept 28
Holman J
JurisdictionBritish citizensForced marriage protection ordersVulnerable British citizens living in Somalia Older sister living in England concerned about forced marriage in SomaliaSolicitor instituting proceedings for protection ordersWhether proceedings properly instituted

The older sister of three younger siblings, two brothers aged 19 and 17 and a sister aged 15, contacted the Forced Marriage Unit of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and said that she was concerned that at least one of her younger siblings was about to be forced into marriage by his mother in Somalia. The siblings, all British citizens, had been living lawfully with their mother in Somalia for at least ten years and none of them had set foot in England in that time, nor, despite various efforts, had anybody been able to locate the family in Somalia. Having been contacted by the Forced Marriage Unit, a solicitor instituted proceedings in the High Court, naming the three younger siblings as the applicants. In those proceedings the court had made several forced marriage protection orders the last of which was expressly stated to expire at the time of the present hearing. The solicitor applied to renew or extend the existing orders and to make the two youngest siblings wards of court.

On the applications—

Held, applications refused. The court’s inherent jurisdiction to make protective orders in respect of vulnerable persons based on nationality alone required to be exercised with caution and circumspection. Here none of the siblings had lived in the United Kingdom at all for at least ten years and the youngest had been born in Somalia, albeit she might be entitled to British citizenship because her mother was a British citizen at the time of her birth. The solicitor involved, although acting in the utmost good faith, was in fact acting without any instructions at all from, or on behalf of, any of the named applicants. So this was an application which, on analysis, was being made entirely altruistically on no instructions whatsoever. While the court declined to extend or renew the existing orders, being unsatisfied that currently there was a properly constituted set of proceedings, that outcome and the judgment had to be drawn to the attention of the Forced Marriage Unit, and the order would make express on its face that if the Government, through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, wished to apply for an order in protection of any of the present applicants on the basis of their being British citizens, it might do so (paras 5, 8).

Al-Jeffrey v Al-Jeffrey [2016] EWHC 2151 (Fam) distinguished.

Per curiam. If it is the view of the Government, through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, that the British Government should itself pro-actively take steps to protect anyone who is a British citizen, wherever they may be, from forced marriage, even if their current and recent connection with the United Kingdom is that of citizenship alone then the proper applicant in such a case should not be the people concerned acting through, or supposedly acting through, a litigation friend of whom they have absolutely no knowledge. Rather, it should be the Government itself acting through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and more specifically the Forced Marriage Protection Unit (para 7).

Mehvish Chaudhry (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the applicants.

Jeanette Burn, Barrister

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies