Privy Council
O’Connor and others v Proprietors, Strata Plan No 51
[On appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Turks and Caicos Islands]
[2017] UKPC 45
2017 Nov 13;
Dec 21
Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs JJSC
Turks and Caicos IslandsLandlord and tenantStrata propertyProprietors of apartment block holding title under strata systemProprietors thereby owning individual freehold of own apartment but collectively forming body corporate having management and control of use of block exercised in accordance with byelaws drawn up thereforByelaw restricting usage of apartments to “residential use” and restricting leasing to periods exceeding one month Owners of apartment letting it to holidaymakers for short stays under one monthCorporation seeking order restraining use as contrary to byelaw Whether byelaw amounting to prohibition on leasing contrary to statutory provision Whether permissible as allowing leasing save where outside meaning of “residential use” Whether use of apartment for short-stay holiday “residential use” Strata Titles Ordinance (Laws of Turks and Caicos Islands, 2009 rev, cap 9.04), s 20(4)

The plaintiff was a body corporate comprising the proprietors of a residential apartment block in the Turks and Caicos Islands held under strata title whereby each proprietor held the individual freehold of his own apartment but, on the registration of the strata plan, collectively formed the body corporate which managed and controlled use of the block under byelaws specific to the block created for that purpose. Byelaw 7.1.9 prohibited any use of apartments save as a private residence but permitted their letting out from time to time for any period in excess of one month. The defendant owners of one apartment began letting it out for short term holiday lets of under one month and the plaintiff sought an order prohibiting such use. The judge refused the order on the ground that section 20(1) of the Strata Titles Ordinance prohibited any strata title byelaw from prohibiting the leasing of strata lots. The Court of Appeal of the Turks and Caicos Islands reversed that decision and granted the order sought, whereupon the defendants appealed to the Privy Council.

Held, appeal dismissed. The byelaws in terms described the apartments as intended for use as a residence. Byelaw 7.1.9 did not amount to a restriction on rental but allowed it provided the letting maintained the character of residential use. It had been common ground that a strata byelaw designed to secure restriction to residential use was in principle unobjectionable. Residential use required a degree of permanence, and an intent to use the property as a home. Use of a property for a few weeks’ holiday did not have that character. The byelaw did not involve an impermissible restriction on leasing contrary to section 20(4) (paras 16-20).

Caradon District Council v Paton (2000) 33 HLR 34, CA applied.

Decision of Court of Appeal of the Turks and Caicos Islands affirmed.

James Thom QC and Stephen Wilson QC (of the Turks and Caicos Bar) (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell llp) for the defendants.

Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC, Conrad Griffiths QC (of the Turks and Caicos Bar) and Martin Dray (instructed by Sharpe Pritchard llp) for the plaintiff company.

Colin Beresford, Barrister

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies