Supreme Court
Birch v Birch
[2017] UKSC 53
2017 May 22; July 26
Baroness Hale of Richmond DPSC, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes JJSC
MarriageFinancial provisionAgreementConsent order giving effect to compromise of financial claims including undertakings given by wifeWife applying to vary undertakingWhether court having jurisdiction to vary undertaking Whether power to discharge undertaking on condition further or different undertaking givenWhether consent order susceptible to being framed as an order for sale Circumstances in which jurisdiction to discharge undertaking or vary consent order to be exercised Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c 18) (as amended by the Matrimonial Homes and Property Act 1981 (c 24), ss 7, 8(2)(a) and the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (c 42), ss 6(4), 48(2)), ss 24A(1)(4), 31

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies