Court of Justice of the European Union
ERGO Poist’ovňa as
v
Barlíková
(Case C‑48/16)
EU:C:2017:377
2017 Jan 12;
May 17
President of Chamber T von Danwitz,
Judges E Juhász, C Vajda, K Jürimäe, C Lycourgos
Advocate General M Szpunar
AgencyAgency agreementCommercial agentAgent receiving advance commissionPartial non-execution of contract between third party and principalPrincipal seeking reimbursement of commissionWhether partial non-execution of contract extinguishing right to commissionWhether provision in commercial agency agreement requiring reimbursement constituting prohibited derogation from right to commissionWhether principal can be to blame if reason for non-execution factual rather than legal Council Directive 86/653/EEC, art 11
This content is available only to subscribers. If you have a subscription to this content, please log in.
If not, you can subscribe online, request a free trial, or contact ICLR by email at enquiries@iclr.co.uk or on +44 (0) 207 242 6471 to discuss further options.
JOHs should sign in via eLIS.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies